![]() I find it happens quite often, particularly with EVFs, where you're not looking at details so closely. OT: How many photos have you taken over the years, only to find things in the composition during post, that you never noticed while in the field? I kept thinking I'd zapped them all, then spotted some more. The only hard part was finding them all - there turned out to be a lot more birds than I'd realised when I selected the image. You just have to paint over each one with a small brush, which only takes a couple of seconds per bird. (BTW, appreciate you going to trouble to illustrate your point.)Īnd it wasn't a herculean task to remove the birds? That's an EXCELLENT example that you picked, because of the variable cloud texture behind the birds. I then used the ReTouch tool to remove them individually. I don't have dust spots in my images, so I picked an example of a shot with lots of birds: ![]() Will be interesting to see the effect of version 6.īut the spots are spanning clouds. Starting to PP last year's fall foliage shots, and the most elaborate PP'ing that I do is 1-shot HDR + 50% ClearView. But be warned that it's not compatible with the original, rather basic dust spot removal tool, so old edited images may behave differently in PL6. It's now quite a powerful clone tool, and capable of much more than just dust spot removal. Yes, the new ReTouch tool is much improved in PL6. ![]() Realized that I haven't upgraded in a while, and though I'm pretty happy with version 3.2, improved dust spot removal could be worth it upgrading. Has DxO improved dust spot removal in the last couple of versions of Photo Lab? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |